HOME


Get regular updates
delivered to your inbox.

Enter your e-mail address:


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

tracker


The views expressed on the following sites are not necessarily those of EverVigilant.net

WRITERS/COLUMNISTS
   Chuck Baldwin
   Bob Barr
   David Alan Black
   Patrick J. Buchanan
   Dmitry Chernikov
   Vox Day
   Thomas DiLorenzo
   Darrell Dow
   Thomas Fleming
   Pieter Friedrich
   Steven Greenhut
   William N. Grigg
   Jacob G. Hornberger
   Stephan Kinsella
   Eric Margolis
   Ilana Mercer
   Jonathan David Morris
   Albert Mohler
   Gary North
   Ron Paul
   Justin Raimondo
   Fred Reed
   Charley Reese
   Paul Craig Roberts
   Lew Rockwell
   Peter Schiff
   Phyllis Schlafly
   Joseph Sobran
   Joe Soucheray
   Thomas Sowell
   John Stossel
   Andrew Sullivan
   Laurence M. Vance
   Walter Williams
   Thomas E. Woods, Jr.
   Steven Yates

RESOURCES
   Education for Liberty
   Institute on the
      Constitution

   King Lincoln Archive
   Tenth Amendment Center

STAY INFORMED
   Abort73.com
   Acton Institute
   The American View
   American Vision
   Antiwar.com
   Audit the Fed
   Chronicles Magazine
   Conservative Times
   Constitution Party
   Dave Black Online
   Dixie Broadcasting
   Downing Street Memo
   Drudge Report
   Future of Freedom
     Foundation

   GovTrack.us
   Gun Owners of America
   Judicial Watch
   LewRockwell.com
   Ludwig von Mises Institute
   The Memory Hole
   Dr. Joseph Mercola
   Dr. Donald Miller
   The New American
   Newsback.com
   Policy of Liberty
   Proof That God Exists
   The Right Source
   Sobran's
   Southern Heritage 411
   John Stossel (ABC News)
   Strike the Root
   World Magazine
   WorldNetDaily

BLOGROLL
   Adam's Thoughts
   Acton PowerBlog
   The Agitator
   Antiwar.com Blog
   Back Home Again
   The Backwater Report
   Baghdad Burning
   Buried Treasure
   Christian Covenanter
   Christian Exodus
   Conservative Times
   Constitutional Government
   Covenant News
   The Daily Burkeman
   Daily Paul
   Dave Black
   Doug's Blog
   Dow Blog
   Facing the Sharks
   For God, Family, Republic
   Gimmie Back My Bullets
   Grits for Breakfast
   Homeschooling Revolution
   John Lofton
   John Taylor Gatto
   Jonathan Grubbs's Blog
   Karen De Coster
   The Knight Shift
   LewRockwell.com Blog
   Liberty & Power
   Militant Pacifist
   Newsback.com
   Old Virginia Blog
   Orange Punch
   Pieter Friedrich
   Pro Libertate
   Red Pills
   Taki's Daily Blog
   Vox Popoli



SHOP NOW
for EV shirts,
mugs and other items

Your comments
are welcome.


Get Firefox!

- EverVigilant.net -
"The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt." - John Philpot Curran

7/24/2006

Pro-Lifers are Noble, but Gullible

I admire the goal of pro-life groups to end state-sanctioned infanticide in this country, so believe me when I say that I take no pleasure in pointing out that most pro-life supporters are extremely gullible. They seem to fall for just about any scam as long as it appears even remotely pro-life in principle.

We saw it happen when pro-lifers celebrated the purely symbolic victories of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban, which is virtually unenforceable and prohibits the prosecution of murdering mothers, and the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, which contains a specific exemption for abortion providers. Pro-lifers were also duped into believing that the current administration cut off funding for organizations that promote abortion when in reality all it did was redirect money from the United Nations Population Fund to the pro-abortion United States Agency for International Development.

Most recently, pro-lifers have been cheering George W. Bush's first veto in his five-and-a-half year presidency. The bill he vetoed would have expanded federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. Naturally, pro-lifers are patting him on the back, but they forget that it was Bush who forked over federal tax dollars to fund embryonic stem cell research in the first place.

When it comes to legal and constitutional considerations regarding pro-life issues, most pro-life supporters are as clueless as your average politician. Consider, for example, their reaction to Louisiana's recent abortion "ban."

Dorinda Bordlee and Nikolas Nikas, founders of Bioethics Defense Fund, a public-interest law firm "whose mission is to advance human rights from beginning to end," wrote an article praising the legislation as a critical step toward protecting pre-born children once and for all: "That's because the bill, La. S.B. 33 by Senator Nevers, has a Post-Roe Activation clause, meaning that the law goes into effect only when '[a]ny decision of the United States Supreme Court ... reverses, in whole or in part, Roe v. Wade, ... thereby restoring to the state of Louisiana the authority to prohibit abortion.'"

They are critical of those who have called this "feel-good legislation," but that's exactly what it is. It perpetuates the myth that the states are subject to unconstitutional federal court rulings. You see, the authority to prohibit abortion was never taken away from Louisiana—at least not in the legal or constitutional sense. It only seems that way because we have willingly ceded control of the country to a judicial oligarchy.

What pro-lifers—and Americans in general, for that matter—do not understand is that Roe v. Wade is not the law of the land; it never has been and never will be. Despite its name, the "Supreme" Court does not have the authority to enact legislation. That is a power reserved to Congress. Article I of the U.S. Constitution makes that perfectly clear. Legally and constitutionally, Roe v. Wade affects only the parties involved in that particular case.

I realize this may sound like blasphemy in a land ruled by black-robed tyrants, but judges are not gods. Unfortunately, pro-lifers like Bordlee and Nikas continue to buy into the notion that federal judges are above the Constitution and that only they can set things right. What we need are representatives in Congress with the courage to stand up for life, law, and liberty and impeach those judges who seek to legislate from the bench.

Oh, but that would require action on our part. We voters would actually have to exercise a little discretion at the ballot box. It's much easier to simply sit back, cross our fingers, and hope that the corrupt, bloated bureaucracy will one day correct itself.

In the meantime, we can all break out the Champagne and pretend we're making strides toward protecting innocent life. If ignorance is bliss, then we pro-lifers must be some of the happiest folks on the planet.

Labels: ,

2 Comments:

Blogger Sean Scallon said...

If John Roberts votes to uphold Roe v. Wade then what will their reaction be? Hopefully a wake-up call.

8/1/06, 12:11 PM  
Blogger Lee Shelton said...

I don't know. The American people love their sleep.

8/2/06, 6:30 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


TERROR ALERT LEVEL
Terror Alert Level

BLOG ARCHIVES

POSTS BY LABEL
  Abortion
  Big Brother
  Blogging
  Breaking News
  Constitution
  Courts
  Crime
  Culture/Society
  Dixie
  Economics
  Education
  Elections
  Environment
  Eternal Vigilance
  Foreign Policy
  Free Market
  Free Speech
  Government Corruption
  Government Incompetence
  Health
  Homeland Security
  Immigration
  Imperialism
  Just for Fun
  Keep and Bear Arms
  Liberty
  Media
  Military
  Nanny State
  Party Politics
  Personal
  Police State
  Privacy
  Property
  Religion
  Ron Paul
  Science
  Sports
  States' Rights
  Statism
  Stupidity
  Taxes
  Technology
  Tyranny
  War



Take the World's Smallest Political Quiz and find out!

Order the CD